Quad Core

Add a Comment

21 Comments

Comment by Bret Spector on April 27, 2009 at 8:35pm

Yeah. I love quad cores. Who doesn't. Even though most software doesn't even take advantage of all four cores. That's why people see it as something of a waste. I see it as preparing for the future. And that's a good investment ...n my book/

Comment by Ray on April 19, 2009 at 11:27am

I run a Q6600 @ 2.40 GHz

Comment by Emmerich on April 11, 2009 at 6:57pm

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz. From what I see here, not the fastest, but it gets the job done.

Comment by Blake Larivee on April 1, 2009 at 12:12am

I'm running two Core2 Extreme QX9775's (Skulltrail) at 4.0ghz on air.
also have a Q6600 at 4.0ghz running on Chilled water. This my 2nd Q6600 first one was fried after pushing it to 5.0ghz on a suicide run at Quakecon.

Q6600 is the still most popular chip around and I'm still braking records with it.

Comment by Scott Everly on February 6, 2009 at 5:28pm

Sporting a Q6600 here as well

Comment by sonu on February 1, 2009 at 6:30am

I HAVE Q6600 TOO

Comment by Trey on February 1, 2009 at 6:29am

The QX6600 is a good little cpu, 4mb of cache and a lot of room for overclocking make it a great choice for bargain performance.

Comment by The 64-bit geek on January 30, 2009 at 10:13pm

I have been looking around in some peoples profiles and discussions in the forum.
It seems that the Q6600 CPU is popular.

Comment by AdamR on January 19, 2009 at 2:30am

My desktop is currently utilizing aa QX6850, running Windows 7 x64.

- Adam

Comment by Douglas on January 18, 2009 at 2:05am

Im running a q6600 with 3 gb of ram desktop. Using windows xp. With 500 gb of harddrive space, and 20 inch lcd screen. So you guys think i should upgrade my ram ?

:)

• 1
• 2
• 3